Thursday, September 26, 2019

World Population


World Population



There are more than 7 billion people on Earth now, and roughly one in eight of us doesn't have enough to eat. The question of how many people the Earth can support is a long-standing one that becomes more intense as the world's population—and our use of natural resources—keeps booming.

Population debates like this are why, in 2011, National Geographic published a series called "7 Billion" on world population, its trends, implications, and future. After years of examining global environmental issues such as climate change, energy, food supply, and freshwater, we thought the time was ripe for a deep discussion of people and how we are connected to all these other issues—issues that are getting increased attention today, amid the new population projections.

After all, how many of us there are, how many children we have, how long we live, and where and how we live affect virtually every aspect of the planet upon which we rely to survive: the land, oceans, fisheries, forests, wildlife, grasslands, rivers and lakes, groundwater, air quality, atmosphere, weather, and climate.

Even though more than 800 million people worldwide don’t have enough to eat now, the mass starvation envisioned hasn't happened. This is primarily because advances in agriculture—including improved plant breeding and the use of chemical fertilizers—have kept global harvests increasing fast enough to mostly keep up with demand.

As part of this human-dominated era, the past half century also has been referred to as a period of "Great Acceleration" by Will Steffen at International Geosphere-Biosphere Program. Besides a nearly tripling of human population since the end of World War II, our presence has been marked by a dramatic increase in human activity—the damming of rivers, soaring water use, expansion of cropland, increased use of irrigation and fertilizers, a loss of forests, and more motor vehicles. There also has been a sharp rise in the use of coal, oil, and gas, and a rapid increase in the atmosphere of methane and carbon dioxide, greenhouse gases that result from changes in land use and the burning of such fuels.

One of our biggest impacts is agriculture. Whether we can grow enough food sustainably for an expanding world population also presents an urgent challenge, and this becomes only more so in light of these new population projections. Where will food for an additional 2 to 3 billion people come from when we are already barely keeping up with 7 billion?

As climate change damages crop yields and extreme weather disrupts harvests, growing enough food for our expanding population has become what the 2014 World Food Prize Symposium calls "the greatest challenge in human history."

Population is not just about numbers of people. Demographers typically focus on three dimensions—fertility, mortality, and migration—when examining population trends. Fertility examines how many children a woman bears in her lifetime, mortality looks at how long we live, and migration focuses on where we live and move. Each of these population qualities influences the nature of our presence and impact across the planet.
Improved education, especially for girls, is cited as a key driver of declining family size. Having light at night can become a gateway to better education for millions of young people and the realization that opportunities and choices besides bearing many children can await.

20 Things to do and pass it on to others to lower your impact of the environment:

1.    Use glass straws or stainless straws instead of plastic ones. Each day more than 500,000,000 plastic straws are used in the United States. The Last Plastic Straw initiative seeks to activate citizens through a grassroots campaign to encourage individuals to push for change in restaurant protocol and practices in their local communities around the world.
2.    Use cloth napkins for all meals.
3.    Use public transportation when you can. Avoid air travel when possible, as it uses large amounts of fossil fuels and contributes to greenhouse gases.
4.    Unplug chargers, refusing to use energy when it’s not even working for us. Put the kids in charge for increased success.
5.    Volunteer where we can, to inform and inspire others.
6.    Wash laundry in cold water and hang dry when the weather allows.
7.    Reuse cloths (and old t-shirts that are too stained and torn for hand-me-downs) for cleaning cloths around the house.
8.    Bring your own reusable bags to the farmers market or grocery. Vendors love it, and so do we. 
9.    When you consume meat, make sure it’s from a reputable source or farm where animals are treated humanely, can roam free, and are not given hormones or antibiotics.
10. Shop for local, organic produce. We choose to support our local farmers markets for so many reasons, but one reason is NO pesky stickers on each piece of food. That’s a small step to reduce your impact, but one your body reaps the benefits.
11. Choose organic/ethical clothing as much as possible – reducing chemicals, formaldehyde, phthalates coming into your home.
12. Avoid single-use items. Our oceans are filled with plastic bottles and items that were used short term. Thinking twice about buying short-term items in plastic is one of the most impactful green choices you can make.
13. Demand for climate solution for this 2020 election from our candidates!
14. Change to energy-efficient light bulbs
15. Get a home or workplace energy audit to identify where you can make the most energy-saving gains
16. Grow your own vegetables in your backyard
17. Eat more meat-free meals
18. Install solar panels at home or your business place to reduce fossil fuel consumption
19. Vote for leaders at all levels of government who take climate change seriously. They should commit to setting science-based targets to reduce harmful carbon emissions, implementing clear plans to reach those targets, adapting to climate change and shifting to a clean-energy economy.
20. Start or led a local movement in climate change.

Pass on this message and share:


Wednesday, September 18, 2019

Climate Change


Climate Change

Throughout the only remaining century the consumption of non-renewable energy sources like coal and oil has expanded the centralization of environmental carbon dioxide (CO2). This happens in light of the fact that the coal or oil consuming procedure consolidates carbon with oxygen noticeable all around to make CO2. To a lesser degree, the clearing of land for agribusiness, industry, and other human activities has expanded convergences of ozone depleting substances causing the greenhouse effects.

The outcomes of changing the characteristic environmental greenhouse effect are hard to anticipate, yet certain impacts appear to be likely:

By and large, Earth will wind up hotter. A few districts on Earth may invite hotter temperatures, yet others may not.

Hotter conditions will presumably prompt more vanishing and precipitation generally speaking, however singular areas will fluctuate, some getting to be wetter such as flooding and others dryer becoming a desert land.

A more grounded greenhouse impact will warm the seas and mostly liquefy icy masses and
other ice, expanding ocean level. Sea water additionally will grow on the off chance that it warms, contributing further to ocean level ascent.

In the interim, a few yields of agriculture and different plants may react positively to expanded barometrical CO2, developing all the more enthusiastically and utilizing water all the more effectively. Simultaneously, higher temperatures and moving atmosphere examples may change the territories where yields develop best and influence the cosmetics of common plant networks in their own communities.

In its Fifth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a gathering of 1,300 free logical scientific specialists from nations everywhere throughout the world under the protection of the United Nations, finished up there's an in excess of 95 percent likelihood that human activities in the course of recent years have warmed our planet.

The industries today that our cutting-edge human progress relies on, have raised barometrical carbon dioxide levels from 280 parts per every million to 400 parts per each million over the most recent 150 years. The board likewise finished up there's a superior chance than 95 percent likelihood that human-created ozone depleting substances, for example, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have caused a significant part of the watched increment in Earth's temperatures in the course of recent years.

As a whole society we need to take a different path otherwise our future of our planet may be at risk. In the Ted Talk by Alice Bows she discusses the implication of what would happen if we do not change. Her theories are to change the way we do things as climate change occurs to reduce a four-degree weather path for Earth. We need to reduce emissions and decarbonize our energy system. We need to reduce energy demand whether it be in nuclear power, carbon capture and storage, biofuel production or rolling out wind turbines and wave turbines to be focus more on energy efficient. We need to implement energy policy in countries that uses higher energy than those that might be conserving energy already such as lower emissions and reducing energy consumption per capita.

To reduce our carbon footprint, we can do the following things:


1.     Become carbon neutrality by producing products that are generated through renewable energy projects and more energy efficient projects which bring developing countries to reduce greenhouse effect within the world.
2.     Invest in carbon reduction projects creating a carbon neutral environment which benefits biodiversity, education, jobs, food security and clean drinking water in developing countries.
3.     Increase more policies in developing countries to reduce carbon footprint assisting with energy savings plan, reducing climate changes, and increasing organizations sustainability programs.
4.     Plant trees and avoid deforestation programs which are business that supports them.  Look for logos that supports sustainability in the rainforest and other forest. Look for products that has FSC certification on them.
5.     Engage in learning and train people about sustainable goals, products, services and business models.


Electricity = 867 kWh at a factor of 0.2505 kgCO2e/kWh
Natural Gas = 557 therms
Propane = 3 US gallons
Total House Footprint = 0.65 metric tons of CO2e
Total car footprint = 0.15 metric tons of CO2e

What I want to achieve is:

Electricity = 400 kWh at a factor of 0.2505 kgCO2e/kWh
Natural Gas = 200 therms
Propane = 1 US gallons
Total House Footprint = 0.24 metric tons of CO2e
Total car footprint = 0.07 metric tons of CO2e

View these videos to watch and share:



Thursday, September 12, 2019

Go Local - Sonoma County Retailers: Oliver's Market



Chain store expansion has debilitated nearby economies, disintegrated network character, and ruined urban and social life. Additionally, combination has decreased challenge and may hurt purchasers over the long haul. As opposed to tried and true way of thinking, the decrease of autonomous organizations isn't unavoidable, nor is it just the consequence of free market powers. Or maybe, open strategy has assumed a noteworthy job, especially through expense motivators and other improvement endowments that give popular stores a critical favorable position. In the interim, a developing number of networks are adopting an alternate strategy. They are embracing area use decides that prevent chain stores and effectively support nearby possession.

“Go-local” is the new trend in business expansion for Oliver’s Market in Sonoma County. For its retailers, purchasing from neighborhood such as going “local” lessens spillages and gives an increasingly vigorous multiplier impact from nearby monetary action that increase economic growth locally. Local vendors at that point enhance privately sourced merchandise, for example, bakery items, fresh dairy and deli products, and many other goods using nearby labor, and locally-headquartered corporation hold benefits and make ventures that give further advantages to Sonoma County altogether.

These local economic multiplier effect start with the support of different local organizations, local individuals having employments, and nearby government income dependency on property estimations being upheld and assessable deals nearby. The term refers to the many times dollars are recirculated within a local economy before leaving through the purchase of an import.

On the off chance that nearby food merchants buy products from neighborhood providers, procure neighborhood laborers, and keep the benefits nearby (which is the significant contention against the extension of chain/huge box retail versus a development of neighborhood retail and different firms) for potential reinvestment in the network, the multiplier impact is more vigorous than different retailers who center outside the neighborhood. Like dropping a stone into a lake, an industry's presence or extension has progressively outstretching influences on a nearby economy and past dependent on new career openings made.

Considering the food for over thoughts, a food merchant with central command situated in Sonoma County has a bigger "multiplier" impact since its production network is increasingly nearby because of purchasing neighborhood merchandise and enterprises and holding its benefits locally. Some of these ideals are:

·      Basic food items tasked with the creation of new income that is now spent on laborer compensation, with the cost of merchandise and benefits increasing as the expansion occurs in expenditure;
·      Taxed incomes are produced from assessable retail deals and the resulting purchases of neighborhood merchants and laborers;
·      Some of the merchant's income expands its monetary impacts since nearby work, makers and proprietorship get and spend their segment of complete retail income;
·      Grocers that are not headquartered locally send income to different territories outside Sonoma County;
·      and If headquartered here, the market holds and courses its benefits locally for an extra multiplier impact.

Local neighborhood purchasing from Oliver Markets by purchasing in meats, pastries, dairy items, and produce gives income to nearby organizations such as restaurant owners. This also helps with Oliver's laborers to occupy with nearby magnanimity that gave over $318,000 to neighborhood network associations versus if they were to leak the funds to other chain organizations that give outside of local businesses.

Oliver's has the most vigorous model as a local business by purchasing 27.4 percent of its products and procuring locally holds about 51.4 percent of business incomes made (which is additionally attracted away to government and state charges and the purchasing of non-neighborhood merchandise not ready to be sourced locally).

This examination gives information concerning the financial effects of utilizing a "go-local" methodology. Essential financial hypothesis proposes that purchasers purchase merchandise dependent on motivations that nearby organizations may not control versus national brands. The issue of spillage outside of the local businesses, this creates a progression of salary to territories outside the neighborhood, which in turn makes things worst for the go-local advocate. Non-local firms create spillages of businesses dependency on being headquartered elsewhere. Notwithstanding the business' home office area, organizations produce some an incentive for the nearby economy. They enhance products and ventures for each market in which they work. They purchase neighborhood work, nearby space, and nearby merchandise, for instance. In any case, organizations that has their attention on their endeavors on sourcing products locally extend the worth chain for the local economy. Going local is likewise about conduct change, where vendors and shoppers purchase nearby over least cost because of impetuses to put resources into the nearby network of businesses.

Going locally makes an incredible, financial contrast than purchasing from non-local businesses on Sonoma County. Oliver's present activities give over $184.3 million, $19.3 million in state and neighborhood charges, and make or support over 711.5 occupations for Sonoma County. In the event that a non-nearby food merchant employs and purchases locally in a similar limit, Sonoma County loses over $6.5 million of the more extensive effects on the grounds that the benefits leave from Sonoma County; if the non-neighborhood merchant additionally sources no merchandise locally, Sonoma County loses over $57.6 million every year.

These streams could without much of a stretch be diminished if Oliver's work power were originating from focuses outside Sonoma County and if Oliver's buys more merchandise from outside Sonoma County. Oliver's nearby purchasing conventions are a straightforward however ground-breaking case of going locally.

References:

Porter, M. (2008). Going Local As a Retailer: Oliver's Market 2016. In Sonoma
     State University - Study: Going Local as a Retailer (2008 ed., pp. 1-18).
     Retrieved from https://mdyo8n9ckd3g81vs1qipy6bt-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/
     wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SSU-STudy.pdf